Bi-Polarizing

I know there are daily media stories that serve as reminders that our country is growing more and more politically polarized. One only has to look around to bear witness to some vehement dispute, e.g. health care, climate change, etc. The rise of Tea Party (and Coffee Party) activists and the incivility of discourse and debate have left little room to “agree to disagree.”

But in my opinion, no time of year brings this out more than tax time. My husband and I are a case in point. While I do everything in my power not to overpay taxes, I do believe that we as citizens should pay for the public good and that the most fair way is through income taxes. He, on the other hand, rants throughout the process thinking that taxes are something done to us vs. our responsibility. Unlike the shouting, placard-bearing protesters, he and I can ultimately have civil discussions about what makes for the public good and are we getting what we pay for. We rarely agree.

What’s troubling to me is not that my husband and I run the risk of perpetually canceling out each others’ votes (or can’t get our taxes done on time) but that I see fewer and fewer situations or places where people can actually engage in civil conversation bringing different points of view. “Groupthink” abounds on both sides of the aisle. “You’re either with us or against us” mentality reduces very complex issues into platitudes and sound-bytes. Increasing political polarization in Washington DC is also influencing how we view each other: particularly as voters first, citizens second.

This does not bode well for us either as a country or within our communities. Increasing political polarization is also a reflection of increasing disconnect between diverse people—whether its demographic, economic, geographic diversity and so on. Leadership in this current reality, and certainly into the future, will need focus on building or becoming the bridge among our diversity.

And, yes we will still need to pay taxes.

Share